Tsakonian syntax has several distinctive features, particularly in the placement of clitics and the use of the predicative participle.

Syntax is the study of how words and phrases are arranged to form sentences — the rules that determine word order, agreement, and how different grammatical elements combine. The most remarkable syntactic features of Tsakonian are: the clitic placement rules (which differ between subdialects), the periphrastic verb structure, and the preserved predicative participle. For dialect-specific differences, see 4.4 Dialect Comparison. For clitic forms themselves, see 5.9 Particles and Clitics.

Clitic Placement

The rules for clitic pronoun placement vary between the subdialects and constitute one of the most theoretically interesting features of Tsakonian syntax. (Liosis, 2017)

Propontis Tsakonian

In the Propontis subdialect, clitic pronouns are subject to the same restrictions that apply generally in medieval Greek (cf. Mackridge 1993, Condoravdi & Kiparsky 2004): if the verb is in initial position, the clitics follow it (enclitic); otherwise they precede the verb (proclitic). (Liosis, 2017)

Verb-initial — clitics enclitic:

θωράκαΐν’τοναγό
saw.3PLDO3SGtherabbit

‘They saw the rabbit’ (= είδαν τον τον λαγό) — (Costakis 1957: 118)

Non-verb-initial — clitics proclitic:

µατ’παρακαλέσ’
FUTDO2SGask.1SG.SUBJ

‘I will ask you’ (= θα σε παρακαλέσω) — (Costakis 1957: 96)

Peloponnesian Tsakonian

In Peloponnesian Tsakonian, clitic pronouns are now proclitic in almost all syntactic environments. (Liosis, 2017)

νιενέντζε
DO3SGbrought.3SG

‘S/he brought it’ (= το έφερε) — (Liosis 2007)

θαναµ’αλεί
FUTIO1PLsay.3SG.SUBJ

‘S/he will tell us’ (= θα µας πει) — (Liosis 2007)

Clitic Clustering

When a clitic pronoun and the clitic auxiliary co-occur in the same verb phrase, the two clitics cluster together, and their relative position differs between the Peloponnesian and Propontis subdialects. (Liosis, 2017)

Propontis Tsakonian — verb auxiliary + DO clitic:

πουλώτα-σιέναγρόσ’
selling.M.SGCLA3.PST-DO3PLonepiaster

‘He wanted to sell (was selling) them for one piaster’ — (Costakis 1957: 102)

Peloponnesian Tsakonian — IO + auxiliary pattern:

µ-εκιαούααµαµούµοι
IO1SG-CLA3SG.PSTtelling.F.SGthegrandmothermine

‘My grandmother used to tell me’ — (Costakis 1986, 3: 394)

Possessive and Genitive Constructions

Due to the weakening and near-disappearance of the genitive case (especially in the plural), Tsakonian employs several alternative syntactic strategies:

  • Periphrastic Genitive: Possession is frequently expressed through prepositional phrases using σε (to/in) or από (from) followed by the accusative.
  • Accusative for Possession: The accusative case with the definite article often replaces the genitive form entirely.
  • Synaloepha and Contraction: Possessive constructions often feature phonological merging, such as the contraction of articles with the following noun.

Predicative Participle

Tsakonian preserves the use of the predicative participle after verbs of sensing or starting — a construction unique among modern Greek dialects. A predicative participle is a participle that functions as part of the predicate (the core of the sentence) rather than as a modifier of a noun. The English sentence ‘I saw him running’ contains a predicative participle. This construction has been lost in all other living varieties of Greek. (Liosis, 2017)

TsakonianTranslation
νι οράκα σουρούµενε’I saw him crawling’
αρχινίε δρανίντου (archiníe draníndou)‘s/he started to run’

‘s/he started to run’ (literally ‘began running’) — (Liosis 2007)

This syntactic survival is significant because it represents a construction that has been lost in all other modern Greek varieties, making it an important feature for the historical syntax of Greek.

Periphrastic Verb Constructions in Syntax

The periphrastic verbal system of Tsakonian — formed with the auxiliary ‘to be’ and the participle of the verb — has syntactic consequences, particularly for clitic placement. When a clitic pronoun and a clitic auxiliary co-occur in the same clause, their relative order differs between subdialects (see Clitic Clustering above). (Liosis, 2017)

This is crosslinguistically unusual: periphrastic structures for the subjunctive and imperative are rare across languages (cf. Dahl 1985, Bybee et al. 1994: 104–124), and their presence in Tsakonian cannot easily be interpreted as the result of language decay. The Propontis subdialect additionally features periphrastic subjunctive and imperative forms, which further enrich the syntactic complexity of the verbal system. (Liosis, 2017)